The Golden Gate Bridge’s sidewalks are open to the public and the existing outside railing along the sidewalks is four feet tall. The Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Deterrent System Study (Study) is being conducted by the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (District). The Study will develop and evaluate alternatives for a potential physical suicide deterrent system for the Bridge. The Study is divided into two phases, described below.
Phase 1: Wind Tunnel Testing of Generic Suicide Deterrent Concepts - Fall 2006 to Spring 2007
Long span suspension bridges respond dynamically, and potentially dramatically, to wind. Phase 1 focused on performing wind tunnel testing of generic concepts for a potential suicide deterrent for the Golden Gate Bridge (Bridge). The wind tunnel testing determined which generic concepts do not create wind stability problems for the Bridge. Wind tunnel testing focused on three types of generic concepts: 1) adding to the existing railing; 2) replacing the existing railing; and 3) utilizing nets that cantilever out horizontally. Concepts with various heights, component dimensions and wind appendages were tested to determine which combinations of variables are acceptable for the Bridge, from a wind stability standpoint.
A Phase 1 Wind Study Report documents the wind testing and summarizes the results. Additionally, it includes descriptions and sketches of each concept that passed the wind test. The report was presented at the Building and Operating Committee of the Board of Directors at their regularly scheduled meeting at 10 a.m. on Thursday, May 24, 2007.
Phase 2 : Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Studies - Summer 2007 to Late 2008
Phase 2 will take the Phase 1 generic concepts that passed the wind test and develop potential alternatives for further evaluation. Phase 2 will include both the required federal and state environmental review processes of each potential alternative and will include preliminary engineering of the potential alternatives. The potential alternatives will also be evaluated against each of the Study Criteria, and for anticipated environmental affects. The required evaluation of potential alternatives will consider both a “no-build” alternative as well as several “build” alternatives. Examples of information that will be developed for each alternative include: architectural renderings, visual impact analysis, historic preservation considerations and cost. A draft environmental document containing this information will be released and public comments solicited. The environmental document is currently targeted to be released in June/July 2007.